Proof by contradiction: notes and practice questions
- Proof by contradiction assumes the negation of a statement is true.
- This assumption is used to derive a mathematical impossibility (a contradiction).
- The contradiction proves the initial assumption false, thus validating the original statement.
- Common applications include proving irrationality (e.g., ), properties of logarithms (e.g., ), and number theory statements (e.g., if is even, then is even).
- A key step is often defining a number as a fraction in simplest form, then showing it leads to a shared factor, contradicting the coprime assumption.
- Euclid's proof for the infinitude of primes uses this method by constructing a number that must have a prime factor outside the assumed finite list.
How it is examined
Induction is marked on structure, not just on algebra: state the proposition, prove the base case, assume for , prove for , and write a conclusion that names the base case and the inductive step. Examiners award a mark for that final sentence and students routinely drop it. 6 to 8 marks, Paper 1.
- Proof by mathematical induction.
- Proof by contradiction.
- Use of a counterexample to show that a statement is not always true.
Linking questions
- Other contexts: the four-colour theorem.
- TOK: what is the difference between the inductive method in science and proof by induction in mathematics?
Practice questions
7 questions · 6 medium · 1 hardQuestion 1
MediumPaper 1 · no calculator6 marksConsider an integer . Prove by contradiction that if is divisible by 3, then is also divisible by 3.
Start by assuming the opposite of what you want to prove. What does it mean for an integer not to be divisible by 3? Consider the possible remainders when you divide the integer by 3.
Question 2
HardPaper 1 · no calculator7 marksUse the method of proof by contradiction to prove that for any integer , if is a multiple of 3, then is a multiple of 3.
Start by assuming the opposite of what you want to prove. The negation of 'if P, then Q' is 'P and not Q'. Consider the forms an integer can take if it is not a multiple of 3.
Question 3
MediumPaper 2 · calculator6 marksA cryptographer is investigating a proposed encryption algorithm. The algorithm relies on the property that for any two integers, and , the expression can never be equal to zero.
Prove this property by contradiction.
Start by assuming the opposite of what you need to prove. Consider the parity (even or odd) of the terms involved.
Question 4
MediumPaper 1 · no calculator8 marksGive a counterexample to prove that each of the following statements is false:
(a) If , then for all .
(b) The expression generates a prime number for all .
(c) The sum of two irrational numbers is always irrational.
(d) If a positive integer is prime, then is composite.
Consider cases where x and y might be positive or negative. What happens to an inequality when you square both sides?
Test small integer values for n, starting from 1, and check if the result is a prime number. Remember a prime number has exactly two distinct positive divisors: 1 and itself.
Think of two irrational numbers that might cancel each other out in some way when added.
Check the very first prime number.
Question 5
MediumPaper 1 · no calculator5 marksProve by contradiction that the product of a non-zero rational number and an irrational number is irrational.
Start by assuming the opposite of what you want to prove. Assume the product is rational. Then, use the definitions of rational and irrational numbers to manipulate the equation and find a contradiction.
Question 6
MediumPaper 1 · no calculator4 marksUse the method of proof by contradiction to prove that for any integer , if is a multiple of 3, then is also a multiple of 3.
Start by assuming the opposite of what you want to prove. That is, assume that is a multiple of 3, but is not a multiple of 3. What forms can an integer that is not a multiple of 3 take? Explore the consequences of this assumption for .
Question 7
MediumPaper 2 · calculator6 marksProve by contradiction that is an irrational number.
Start by assuming that is a rational number, meaning it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, . Then, use the properties of logarithms to rearrange this equation and look for a contradiction related to the prime factors of the numbers involved.
No question on this page matches those filters. Try another difficulty or paper.
Every Proof by contradiction question, marked for you
Every answer is marked mark by mark, IB-style, and the AI tutor helps when you are stuck.
Where marks are lost
- Rounding an intermediate value and then using it.
- Answering to the wrong accuracy. Two significant figures, or six, where the rule says exactly or three.
- Writing the answer and nothing else.